The quality of diio's response in Explore depends on the quality of the question. Vague questions produce generic responses; specific questions produce exact citations from the transcript. These examples serve as starting points and are organized by use type.

"What objections did the counterpart raise?"

"Did they mention any vendor or competitor? What did they say about them?"

"What information did they ask us to send them?"

"What is the name of the project or initiative they described?"

"What aspects of the product or service generated the most doubts?"

"What did I commit to in this conversation?"

"What did the counterpart promise to do before the next meeting?"

"Was a date or concrete next step defined?"

"What pending items were left without an assigned owner?"

"At what point in the conversation did the mood drop?"

"When did the counterpart show the most enthusiasm or interest?"

"Was there any moment of tension or disagreement?"

"Did the candidate ask about something specific with particular interest?"

"What points were left unresolved that I need to revisit?"

"What is the summary of the conversation in three lines?"

"What context should I mention at the start of the follow-up email to show I was listening?"

These questions cover information beyond that conversation. For them, use the All Conversations list, reports, or the diio WhatsApp chat:

If diio's response is too generic, rephrase the question with more context:

Vague.

Better.